| 
						               
						 why so many of us love war, 
						"shock & awe" bombing, and more 
						war, more war 
						  
						              This past month I 
						attended a rally on the massive air and ground war we 
						and Israel were then unleashing on Lebanon.  I attended 
						because it appalled me that this war targeted civilian 
						centers, with hundreds of deaths of women and children, 
						and thousands of homes, bridges, power plants, roads, 
						ports, and airport facilities destroyed.  I attended 
						also because it agonized me how we, the U.S., were again 
						the ones keying the violence.  Billions of our dollars 
						funded the fighter jets, combat bulldozers, tanks, and 
						guided missiles we put to Israel's use.  For more than a 
						year we two had planned this attack, awaiting but 
						slightest provocation for more of the violence which has 
						been the main foreign policy of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld 
						and their fellow "Christians" and neo-cons. 
						              The trouble is, most 
						Americans love militarism as do our trigger-happy 
						leaders.  That's why our corporate media so often 
						collapse complexities of to trumpet on to us their 
						simpler talk of foreign threats and "evil-doers."  Easy 
						suckers as we are for the clichéd scripts from either 
						Hollywood or Washington, we reserve for ourselves the 
						roles of innocents.  If we get blowback for supporting 
						the cruelest dictatorial regimes in the world (Egypt, 
						Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan), the 
						blowback arrives as if, we think, we have done nothing 
						to provoke it.  Only "evil-doers" terrorize.  They 
						deserve only our best massive death-&-destruction. 
						              After I attended the 
						rally, someone wrote to the local San Francisco 
						Chronicle indignant and incredulous that so many San 
						Francisco liberals now seemed turning against our fellow 
						innocent, Israel.  Like those in the Bush ideology and 
						the "Christian" far-right, this letter writer saw 
						his Zionist state as victim-only.  He held Israel a 
						western-style culture like ours, a democracy whose 
						people only wanted to be left alone, in peace. 
						              The trouble is, Israel, 
						like the U.S., has long committed itself to a permanent 
						state of aggressive war.  Every day it, with our tax 
						funds, sends more settlers to occupy West Bank land.  
						Every day it extends more walls its further-confiscated 
						Palestinian land.  Every day it forces humiliations on 
						thousands of Palestinians at road blocks keeping all 
						their settlements divided.  Even when it finally pulled 
						its 7,000 settlers out of Gaza, Israel simply assigned 
						them and thousands more elsewhere in the Occupied 
						Territories.  These systematic provocations of course 
						incur deep anger in the Palestinians – as our support 
						for the world's worst dictators similarly banks hatreds 
						and desires for revenge against us. 
						              The fellow who wrote 
						the San Francisco Chronicle claimed he was 
						"dumbfounded" his liberal friends seemed to be turning 
						against his Israel.  So I wrote: 
						  
						I sympathize with Alan Segal's being 
						"dumbfounded"by his fellow liberals who seem to support groups like 
						Hezbollah and
 Hamas ("Hateful radicals hijack peace protest," Aug. 
						15).  As one who was at that rally –  apparently on the 
						Arabic or  Islamic side – I'd like to say I have no 
						Arabic or Muslim friends.  But I have great distress 
						over the policies of our U.S. government.
 
						  
						It distresses me that we massively 
						subsidize Israel as it stealsmore Palestinian land every year – ever expanding its 
						settlements on that land,
 now also walling off the indigenous "Injuns."  These 
						cruelties might not matter so much, except that in 
						humiliating the locals as we help to do, we forget how 
						we also anger many millions more by our propping up the 
						worst dictatorships of that region.  U.S. support to the 
						regimes of Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia may benefit 
						our corporate rich, but it insults our own best 
						principles (and brings brutal blowback).  Thus I side
 not just with Hezbollah and Hamas, but with whomever 
						necessary
 to protest our worst American cruelties and injustice.
 
						  
						              This letter, which I 
						copied to many of my friends and some of the far-right "Christians" 
						in my extended family, got lots of anger in response.  
						Speaking out against our and Israel's militarism 
						signified to several friends and family that I'd become 
						a lover of terrorism.  It didn't occur to them that for 
						years we and Israel have had no peace process, only war 
						readiness.  It didn't occur to them that our policies 
						almost always side with the world's cruelest 
						dictatorships, and that we thus turn millions of good 
						people against us – for how we fund the sybaritic 
						lifestyles they hate to see in their dictators' 
						families, how we train their secret police in 
						"disappearing" and torture techniques, and how we 
						militarily equip their dictators to continue their 
						cruelties and suppressions. 
						              Damages we do to 
						"others" don't occur to us as reality when we learn 
						to exclude whole ranges of reference to "others."  
						Our schools do this for us.  For them – for their 
						impersonality conceits and mutually-isolated 
						specializations – we learn to settle to settle in 
						corporate imagination:  all withdrawn in our flow chart 
						places, as in consumer culture we're all primed to do 
						our buying in our properly-marketed demographic niches. 
						              So in America we have a 
						culture of class separation and division every bit as 
						thorough now as was our racial segregation fifty years 
						ago.  For diversion, we have war and massacre – all run 
						by those in Washington who cry wolf, exploit fear, and 
						sing for war and more war by the clichés that trained 
						simpletons and simpleton media can hum. 
						              This was the month, 
						too, of the anniversaries of our nuclear terror bombings 
						on the hundreds of thousands of civilians at Nagasaki 
						and Hiroshima – the world's first uses of the atom bomb 
						– uses which Eisenhower opposed, MacArthur opposed, the 
						commander of the U.S. Navy opposed, and our Department 
						of War even cited as unnecessary, given that Japan was 
						then trying to surrender, that the Japanese home islands 
						were cut off from re-supply, and that their armies could 
						not long fight.Those in power then, however, like 
						those in power now (often the very same family lines) 
						ignored the reality on the ground of their time, as 
						their likes do today.  But the rest of us are no 
						better:  none can see idiocy when we all inhabit the 
						same mutual isolations our corporate culture teaches us 
						to fit.  Our corporate marketing and advertising 
						together parallel the same values we get in corporate 
						academe.  The former may seem to be a game.  The latter, 
						however, is not, run by souls as deadly serious as those 
						who'd fallen to the same impersonal proprieties as in 
						Invasion of the Body Snatchers.   Thus we learn 
						cynicism, trained are we are not to inquire much of or 
						link much to "others."  We have, instead, cycles of 
						permanent war, always fueled by most-recent excuses for 
						hatreds whose origins lay so much deeper in our nice, 
						proper institutions seemingly so much above and beyond 
						it all. |